Kết xuấtvi

tổng

Translation status: Tiếng Việt reader-locale proof. Term names and code fences follow the vi pack; supporting prose may still be English.

Sequential sum-reduce expression: summa ex <tensor> apud [i] fixum s { redde <term> }.

Syntax: summa ex <source> apud [coords] fixum <binder> { redde <term> }

Category#

collection

Examples#

radix/corpus/lista/methodi-functionales.fab (canonical · existing-home)#

Returns the sum of numeric list elements.

# =============================================================================
# summa — Returns the sum of numeric list elements.
# =============================================================================
#
# What this teaches:
#   • higher-order intrinsics for lists — `filtrata` (filter), `mappata` (map), `reducta` (fold), `cumulata` (cumulate)
#   • closure syntax with `∴` — inline anonymous functions for collection operations
#
# Common mistakes:
#   • Omitting the initial accumulator value in reducta/cumulata — both require an explicit seed argument.
#
# See also: prima, ultima, lista
# =============================================================================

# lista<T> higher-order intrinsics
#
# res.filter(T x ∴ <pred>)                        -- filter
# res.map(T x ∴ <expr>)                         -- map
# res.reduce((acc, x) ∴ <expr>, init)              -- fold
# res.cumulata((acc, x) ∴ <expr>, init)             -- cumulate (serial prefix scan)
#
# GRAMMAR:
#   listMethod :← expr '.' ('filtrata' | 'mappata' | 'reducta' | 'cumulata') '(' closure ')'
#
# EXPECTED OUTPUT:
#   [2, 4]
#   [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
#   15
#   [1, 3, 6, 10, 15]
#
# BACKEND: Go e2e whitelist — lista intrinsic methods not yet lowered for Go
# (whitelist: lista/methodi-functionales.fab).

main {
    const _ res  [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] ∷ list<int>

    const _ pares  res.filter(int x ∴ x % 2  0)
    const _ duplicata  res.map(int x ∴ x * 2)
    const _ summa  res.reduce((int collectus, int x) ∴ collectus + x, 0)
    const _ cumulata  res.cumulate((int collectus, int x) ∴ collectus + x, 0)

    print pares
    print duplicata
    print summa
    print cumulata
}

Expected output:

[2, 4]
[2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
15
[1, 3, 6, 10, 15]

radix/corpus/summa/summa.fab (canonical · concept)#

Sequential sum-reduce expression: summa ex <tensor> apud [i] fixum s { redde <term> }.

# =============================================================================
# summa — one-expression sequential sum-reduce over a tensor
# =============================================================================
#
# What this teaches:
#   • Sequential fold — `summa ex` lowers to a MIR fold over the tensor's
#     apud iteration arm: a `+` accumulator seeded at zero, one term per
#     element, `redde` inside the body yields the term value.
#   • Identity term — `redde s` is the sequential spelling of `a.summa()`;
#     the printed pair matches under the numeric tolerance contract.
#   • Transformed term — the body may compute any numeric scalar term from
#     the bound element (here `s + 1.0` per lane).
#
# Common mistakes:
#   • non-scalar terms — the term must be a numeric scalar (fractus/numerus)
#   • the distributed `filum` spelling is admitted only inside `@ nucleum`
#     kernels (v1)
#
# See also: tensor, apud, filum
# =============================================================================

functio identity(tensor<f32, [8]> a)  f32 {
    redde summa ex a apud [i] fixum s { redde s }
}

functio shifted(tensor<f32, [8]> a)  f32 {
    redde summa ex a apud [i] fixum s {
        varia f32 t  s
        t  t + 1.0
        redde t
    }
}

incipit {
    fixum lista<f32> flat  [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0]
    fixum tf32[] seed  vacua
    fixum tf32[8] a  seed.strue(flat, [8])

    fixum f32 per_summam  a.summa()
    fixum f32 plicatum  identity(a)
    fixum f32 summam_totam  shifted(a)

    nota per_summam
    nota plicatum
    nota summam_totam
}

Expected output:

36.0
36.0
44.0

radix/corpus/summa/summa-combine-refusal.fab (supporting · reject)#

General-combine refusal: summa admits no identity/combine clause — the combine is sum only, pinned by a parse reject.

# =============================================================================
# summa general-combine refusal — no identity/combine clause exists.
# =============================================================================
#
# Decline row (reject reason in the comment):
#   1. general combine — the reducta ruling bars overloading `summa` with a
#      general combiner; there is no identity or combine clause in the
#      grammar. An attempted `coniunge` tail after the binder fails at
#      parse: the production expects the term block, never an operator
#
# Common mistakes:
#   • expecting `summa` to spell product/min/max reduces — the combine is
#     sum only; general reduce/scan heads belong to the rejection-review
#     sketch, and `reducta`/`cumulata` own the intrinsic family
#
# See also: summa, filum, apud, tensor
# =============================================================================

# 1. general combine — a combine-operator tail is not grammar; parse reject
functio product(tensor<f32, [8]> a)  f32 {
    redde summa ex a apud [i] fixum sconiunge '*' { redde s }
}

Expected: compilation rejects this example.

radix/corpus/summa/summa-decline.fab (supporting · reject)#

summa decline rows: filum placement outside @ nucleum, K % 32 ≠ 0 tails, and non-scalar terms fail closed.

# =============================================================================
# summa decline — placement, tail alignment, and scalar terms fail closed.
# =============================================================================
#
# Decline rows (reject reason in each comment):
#   1. placement — `filum` admits only inside an `@ nucleum` kernel;
#      this host function declines: SEM010 summa_filum_requires_nucleum_kernel
#   2. tail — K = 8 is not a multiple of the 32-lane width; the v1 tail
#      gate fails closed at admission:
#      SEM010 summa_tail_not_aligned
#   3. non-scalar term — the term body returns a matrix row (a tensor),
#      not a numeric scalar: SEM010 summa_term_type_non_scalar
#
# Common mistakes:
#   • expecting a partial-lane filum fold — K % W ≠ 0 is an admission
#     error, never a tail loop
#   • expecting list/tensor terms to combine element-wise — the term type
#     must be a scalar of the element family
#
# See also: summa, filum, nucleum, apud, tensor
# =============================================================================

# 1. placement — filum outside @ nucleum declines
functio placement(tensor<f32, [32]> a)  f32 {
    redde summa ex a apud [i] filum f fixum s { redde s }
}

# 2. tail — K = 8 not aligned to the 32-lane width declines
@ nucleum
functio tail(tensor<f32, [8]> a, tf32[1] out, u32 id)  vacuum {
    fixum f32 total  summa ex a apud [i] filum f fixum s { redde s }
    out[id]  total
}

# 3. non-scalar term — a textus element is not a numeric scalar
functio non_scalar(tensor<textus, [8]> t)  textus {
    redde summa ex t apud [i] fixum s { redde s }
}

Expected: compilation rejects this example.